Tuesday, April 29, 2025


Occupy Route 12

Pokeflutes? Oh sure they’ll get the job done, but it won’t inflict paralyze and burn on Snorlax!
By Jeremy Vinar and Mike Fahme [Virtual Shackles] submitted by SSFF6B and Alex D.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin



Posted by Shawn Handyside on December 1, 2011 · 3:00 PM 
FAILLAMENOT BADPRETTY GOODAWESOME (263 votes, average: 4.41 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
Categories:
Artistic, Gameboy, Nintendo, Overkill, Pokémon, Political, Sequential Art, Special Attacks, Weak Points

· Leave a comment (96 Comments)





 

Comments (96)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
Reply
1% of the vending machines raised the cost of lemonade by 99%!
Occupy Celadon
Reply
1 reply · active 699 weeks ago
Occupy Route 12. Because 1% of the Snorlax should not be able to block 99% of the path.
Reply
Shouldn't Snorlax be happy? I mean, according to Fox News pepper spray is basically a food product, and we all know how much Snorlax loves to eat!
Reply
5 replies · active 699 weeks ago
1% of Pokemon Trainers own 99% of all mountains.
Occupy Mt. Silver!

Wait, wait...
Forget you heard that
Reply
20 replies · active 699 weeks ago
I could never find that HM in the games...
Reply
8 replies · active 699 weeks ago
The cop is missing his epic mustache...

Guess I'll throw this in here for those that have yet to notice why this mustache is so epic:
Reply
2 replies · active 699 weeks ago
I want to see the cop spray a legendary. :X
Reply
1 reply · active 699 weeks ago
Man, that's one tall cop. He outsizes the Snorlax.
Reply
2 replies · active 699 weeks ago
Uh oh, now PETA is going to yell at everyone for pokemon cruelty!
Reply
1 reply · active 699 weeks ago
I got a burn for ya!

Reply
Cave Johnson here...

Now we all know that Route 12 is Aperture Science's private property. If that Snorlax wants to lay around blocking the way, well then we're going to have to settle things with our security androids. Better yet, why don't we hire a 10 year old kid to get it out of the way for us?

Why? Because androids are expensive and Prof. Oak owes us one. Now I know you're going to complain about the rights of the pokemon, but I'll tell you one thing: Our complaints department would be happy to receive your input. Yup, we need fuel for our furnaces since the budget is a little thin this year. We could only afford to prototype seventeen new curtain lines.

Now if you "Pokehuggers" want to fight for that snorlax, great. Just do it off my damned property. You're ruining my view.

Cave Johnson. We're done here.
Reply
Was that cop a legal pokemon? I WANT TO SEE HIS PAPERS!
Reply
2 replies · active 699 weeks ago
I wonder what happens if that you use pepper spray on a Pokemon with Keen Eye?
Reply
2 replies · active 699 weeks ago
1% of Pokemon in the world is taking up 99% of the path!
OCCUPY ROUTE 12!

1% of the trainers has 99% of the Legndaries!
OCCUPY MT. SiLVER! (Yeah, We're coming Red)

1% of...meh, I got nothing.
Also, this is a fun meme.
Reply
3 replies · active 699 weeks ago
Hyper Beam

It's bad breath, essentially.
Reply
Occupy Khoto
because no single city should have 99% of the road links
Reply
If you look at the map, can't Red just walk AROUND the Snorlax through the tall grass?
Reply
1 reply · active 699 weeks ago
MY PEPPERSPRAY IS BLASTING OFF AGAIIIIIIN!
Reply
Ahhhh come on now. That spice is necessary to keep the Fat Bastard awake
Reply
Reply
14 replies · active 699 weeks ago
Getting the "Squirtbottle" or "Wailmer Pail" to catch Sudowoodo? Hah, what a joke...


If you are going to beat a pokemon until it can't resist your attempts to confine it and then turn it into your slave for battles, why not use it anyway?
Reply
1 reply · active 699 weeks ago
Shame on you!
Shame on you!
Reply
The thing i don't get about the Snorlax in the game is, couldn't Ash just throw a pokeball at him?
Reply
7 replies · active 699 weeks ago
Meanwhile during Occupy Lavender Town some... Unforeseen circumstances arose.
Reply
This is so funny, I created a profile just to comment on it. You win this round Shawn.
Reply

Comments by